"An Italian scientist says he has reproduced one of the world's most famous Catholic relics, the Shroud of Turin, to support his belief it is a medieval fake, not the cloth Jesus was buried in."

I'm all for backing up claims with serious evidence and I'm more than willing to change my views if evidence proves my ideas to be incorrect, misguided or simply wrong.

Now, if it was possible to make this sorts of prints by using rather simple techniques, then the idea of a "magical" piece of cloth with Jesus' face falls apart. Furthermore, using carbon dating it was shown that the shroud of Turin dates from the Middle Ages.


Now, here's my question:

With this new evidence, do you think it's at least POSSIBLE that the shroud of Turin is
not a print of Jesus' face but in fact the one from a medieval man?

Please answer YES or NO and then if you want elaborate on your answer.




here's the article:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/10/07/italy.turin.shroud/

This item has been blocked and cannot be viewed. The user who posted this item has been blocked due to abuse of the hi5 Terms of Service.